1X Technologies Neo vs Unitree Robotics H2

Cite this page

humanoidrecord.com, "1X Technologies Neo vs Unitree Robotics H2", page snapshot 2026-11-03, https://humanoidrecord.com/compare/1x-neo-vs-unitree-h2/

Embed this comparison

Live and auto-updating. Recommended height: 900px. Links back to humanoidrecord.com.

<iframe src="https://humanoidrecord.com/embed/compare/1x-neo-vs-unitree-h2/" style="width:100%;height:900px;border:0" loading="lazy" title="1X Technologies Neo vs Unitree Robotics H2 — humanoidrecord.com"></iframe>

Dataset date: 2026-11-03

175 cmhuman

no sourced height1X Technologies Neo

180 cm²Unitree Robotics H2

Height to scale. Width is schematic, derived from weight; not a measured body width.

claimed → demonstrated
demonstrated
first delivery recorded

Evidence sheet

Only differences Showing all 20 rows

Evidence sheet, scrolls horizontally below 900px
Property	1X Technologies Neo	Unitree Robotics H2	Difference
Height (cm)	no sourced value	180 cm² Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	unknown on one side
Weight (kg)	30 kg³ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	70 kg² Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	+40 kg
Degrees of freedom	no sourced value	31⁴ Needs review The reviewed source does not provide enough evidence for this specific claim. Reason The reviewed source did not establish both the exact recorded value and the concrete robot variant for this specification. Checked 2026-09-27 Review method Text review Media type Documentation Publisher relation Official source (published by the subject or manufacturer)	unknown on one side
Walking speed (km/h)	no sourced value	7.2 km/h⁵ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	unknown on one side
Payload (kg)	68 kg¹ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	no sourced value	unknown on one side
Battery runtime (min)	no sourced value	no sourced value	no sourced value
Hands	22 DoF⁶ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	no sourced value	unknown on one side
Actuator torque (Nm)	no sourced value	360 Nm⁷ Needs review The reviewed source does not provide enough evidence for this specific claim. Reason The reviewed source did not establish both the exact recorded value and the concrete robot variant for this specification. Checked 2026-09-27 Review method Text review Media type Documentation Publisher relation Official source (published by the subject or manufacturer)	unknown on one side
Battery (Wh)	842 Wh⁸ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	no sourced value	unknown on one side
Battery swappable	no sourced value	no sourced value	no sourced value
Locomotion	bipedal⁹ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	no sourced value	unknown on one side
SDK / ROS	no sourced value	open source, ros2¹⁰ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	unknown on one side
Simulation	No simulation artifact confirmed in targeted search This records a searched-but-not-confirmed result. It does not mean simulation support is unavailable. Search checked 2026-09-27 Search result Targeted searches found no confirmed model for this record; does not mean unavailable. Searched source 1	1 simulation artifact confirmed. Search checked 2026-09-27 Search result The official H2 repository path and MJCF format marker were checked; the model was not executed. Searched source 1 Searched source 2 Official · MJCF · H2 Variant H2 Format MJCF Provenance Official Revision 1eb6642e3f3fdfb7fb13a9794fd6a2dd93ea0e7d License BSD-3-Clause Open simulation artifact Artifact evidence Evidence review: supported The cited source was reviewed and supports this specific claim. This does not establish independent truth. Reason Official repository path and format marker checked; model not executed. Checked 2026-09-27 Review method Text review Media type Repository Publisher relation Official source (published by the subject or manufacturer) Robot variant H2 Simulator compatibility MuJoCo · Documented compatibility Documented compatibility is not a test result. The cited source describes compatibility; this does not mean Humanoid Record tested the integration. Context: The pinned README lists H2 in the simulator robot configuration. Compatibility evidence Evidence review: supported The cited source was reviewed and supports this specific claim. This does not establish independent truth. Reason The pinned official README explicitly names this robot configuration for MuJoCo; no model was executed. Checked 2026-09-27 Review method Text review Media type Repository Publisher relation Official source (published by the subject or manufacturer) Robot variant H2	—
Actuator architecture	2 actuator groups documented. Search checked 2026-09-27 Search result Exact-variant actuator architecture evidence was found in the listed official source and is recorded per group. Searched source 1 Revo2 actuator motor · Neo · Claimed Scope Revo2 actuator motor Variant Neo Evidence status Claimed Drive Electric Transmission Not confirmed Motion Not confirmed Architecture Not confirmed Architecture evidence Evidence review: supported The cited source was reviewed and supports this specific claim. This does not establish independent truth. Reason The official Neo factory article explicitly describes its humanoid actuator motor as electric. Checked 2026-09-27 Review method Text review Media type Article Publisher relation Official source (published by the subject or manufacturer) Robot variant Neo Architecture metadata describes the cited mechanism only. No performance is inferred. Neo actuation transmission · Neo · Claimed Scope Neo actuation transmission Variant Neo Evidence status Claimed Drive Not confirmed Transmission Tendon Motion Not confirmed Architecture Not confirmed Architecture evidence Evidence review: supported The cited source was reviewed and supports this specific claim. This does not establish independent truth. Reason The official Neo factory article explicitly describes Neo's actuation system as tendon-driven. Checked 2026-09-27 Review method Text review Media type Article Publisher relation Official source (published by the subject or manufacturer) Robot variant Neo Architecture metadata describes the cited mechanism only. No performance is inferred.	No actuator architecture confirmed in targeted search This records a searched-but-not-confirmed result. It does not mean a particular architecture is absent. Search checked 2026-09-27 Search result Targeted actuator searches did not confirm an exact-variant architecture claim for this record; this does not mean none exists. Searched source 1	—
Warranty (shortest–longest)	36 mo (US (Early Access / Ownership plan))¹¹ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	no sourced value	unknown on one side
Order type	preorder¹² Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	direct checkout¹³ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	—
Latest price	20,000Early Access (purchase, $200 deposit) · USD · 2025-10-30¹⁴ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	29,900standard · USD · 2026-09-20¹⁵ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	—
Announced	2024-08-01¹⁶ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	2025-10-20¹⁷ Not reviewed The cited source has not been reviewed for this specific claim.	+14 mo
Recorded first customer delivery	no sourced value	no sourced value	no sourced value
Recorded delivery status	Recorded claimed	Recorded claimed	—

Capabilities

Capabilities table
Capability	1X Technologies Neo	Unitree Robotics H2
Teleoperation shown	T¹⁸ Needs review The reviewed source does not provide enough evidence for this specific claim. Reason The text source was reviewed, but no video segment was watched; the existing capability status and autonomy classification for Neo were not fully verified. Checked 2026-09-27 Review method Text review Media type Article Publisher relation Independent source	—

Notes

capable of lifting over 150 pounds (68 kg) and carrying 55 pounds (24.95kg) (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
The H2 stands 180 cm tall and weighs 70 kg. (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
At just 66 pounds (29.94 kg), NEO is capable of lifting over 150 pounds (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
31 degrees of freedom (accessed 2026-09-27) — source
the H1 was celebrated for its record-breaking speed of 3.3 m/s, the H2 is rated for under 2 m/s (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
22 DoF Hands with Human Level Dexterity (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
31 degrees of freedom, 360N.m joint torque, and precise dynamic movement replication. (accessed 2026-09-27) — source
842 Wh (accessed 2026-09-21) — source
a bipedal humanoid designed for home use (accessed 2026-09-21) — source
Unitree robot sdk version 2. https://support.unitree.com/home/zh/developer (accessed 2026-09-21) — source
Ownership with 3-Year Warranty (accessed 2026-09-21) — source
$200 Deposit Due Today (accessed 2026-09-21) — source
Unitree H2 $29,900.00 USD (accessed 2026-09-21) — source
$20,000, which includes priority delivery in 2026 (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
$29,900.00 USD (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
NEO's Original Strategy Reveal: August 2024 — when the company unveiled its strategy to develop NEO (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
Unitree Unveils H2, a Full-Sized Humanoid Successor to the H1 (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
much of the work will be done by teleoperators in the beginning (accessed 2026-09-27) — source

Cite this comparison: https://humanoidrecord.com/compare/1x-neo-vs-unitree-h2/ (data snapshot 2026-11-03)

Correct this comparison or email corrections@humanoidrecord.com.

1X Technologies Neo vs Unitree Robotics H2

Evidence sheet

Simulator compatibility

Capabilities

Notes