LimX Dynamics Oli vs XPeng Iron

Dataset date: 2026-09-20

175 cmhuman
payload 3 kg (claimed)
ClaimedC165 cm2LimX Dynamics Oli
ClaimedC178 cm3XPeng Iron

Height to scale. Width is schematic, derived from weight; not a measured body width.

LimX Dynamics OliLimX Dynamics Oli: announced 2025-07-30, first demo 2025-08-08, no dated delivery evidence
XPeng IronXPeng Iron: announced 2024-11-06, first demo 2025-11-05, no dated delivery evidence

open outline: claimed → demonstrated · hatched: demonstrated · filled dot: first delivery recorded

Evidence sheet

PropertyLimX Dynamics OliXPeng IronDifference
Height (cm)ClaimedC165 cm2ClaimedC178 cm3+13 cm
Weight (kg)no sourced valueClaimedC70 kg3no sourced value
Degrees of freedomClaimedC314ClaimedC603+29 DoF
Walking speed (km/h)ClaimedC5 km/h1no sourced valueno sourced value
Payload (kg)ClaimedC3 kg1no sourced valueno sourced value
Battery runtime (min)no sourced valueno sourced valueno sourced value
Handsno sourced valueno sourced value
Latest priceno sourced valueno sourced value
Announced2025-07-3042024-11-063-8 mo
First customer deliveryno sourced valueno sourced valueno sourced value
Delivery statusdemonstrateddemonstrated

Notes

  1. Single-arm payload is 3 kg. (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
  2. 165cm height (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
  3. stands 178 cm tall (accessed 2026-09-20) — source
  4. 31 active degrees of freedom (accessed 2026-09-20) — source

Cite this comparison: https://humanoidrecord.com/compare/limx-dynamics-oli-vs-xpeng-iron/ (accessed 2026-09-20)

Correct this comparison or email corrections@humanoidrecord.com.